Soaring Heights Pk-8 Pto Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831221108
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Erie, CO, USA
Phone
9709885088
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$165,766
Expenses
$137,218
Assets
$170,288
Liabilities
$17,283

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Nancy Schaefer (President)
  • Caroline Patterson (Vice President)
  • Abby Dobmeier (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Nancy Schaefer (President)
  • Caroline Patterson (Vice President)
  • Abby Dobmeier (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the Soaring Heights PK-8 PTO INC is to support Soaring Heights PK-8 School and its students, teachers and staff by coordinating volunteers, creating a greater sense of community between families and faculty, enhancing the quality of education provided, and to supplement existing school programs and services at Soaring Heights PK-8 School.

What it reported doing in 2024

PTO Grants - Soaring Heights PTO provided a grant program to teachers & staff to apply for needed educational supplies and equipment. The PTO purchased or funded the following items/programs: physics supplies, literacy supplies & books, author visit, technology items, art panels, books and cirriculum for teacher support, & new supplies for various athletics and clubs around school. These purchases support our students as well as our teachers and staff.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 68% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 66% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.8%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 94.1%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.2%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.8% of revenue deployed · 94.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $129K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.