So Send I You Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452836067
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
New York, NY, USA
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$360,977
Expenses
$469,611
Assets
$333,085
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

People named in this filing

  • WILLIAM B SUTTON III (CHAIRMAN)
  • JOHN MCVICKER (VICE CHAIRMAN)
  • ANNVIONA COLEMAN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To educate, nurture and cultivate missional leaders and congregations from within the christian community

What it reported doing in 2025

-Continued international mission work serving men, women, and children in impoverished areas of Africa, Jamaica, Haiti, India, the Bahamas, and other regions, working through established foreign mission partners. -Operated feeding programs providing daily meals to children at schools and daycare centers in Jamaica, Eswatini, South Africa, Lesotho, and surrounding villages, including a feeding station serving about 75 children per day and shipment of a 50-foot container of food and clothing to Malawi -Provided educational support by funding teachers and programs at a daycare center in South Africa, supporting an orphanage in India, assisting school construction in Ghana, helping an African student at American Baptist College, and purchasing approximately 145 pairs of shoes for students in Jamaica. -Supported medical and health initiatives, including A Chance 4 Life in Ghana and partnership with Women at Real Risk in Jamaica for medical relief, sponsorship, and stabilization in trauma-impacted communities. -Conducted community awareness efforts through workshops, quarterly mission presentations to churches and mission groups, and participation in HIV prevention and education activities. -Carried out disaster relief by providing food, funding, roof repairs, clean-water well support, and other aid in Mozambique, Kenya, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Haiti, Lesotho, and among Maasai communities in Kenya, and by purchasing two generators for Keith Primary School in St. Ann, Jamaica.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93.9%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.1%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $441K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.