So Cal Girls Fastpitch
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843278434
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Centers, Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $134,175
- Expenses
- $98,764
- Assets
- $66,955
- Liabilities
- $1,111
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANTONIO LOPEZ (President)
People named in this filing
- ANTONIO LOPEZ (President)
- YADIRA ALTAMIRANO (Treasurer)
- BAMBI PHILLIPS (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to develop girls with strong core values so they may be successful professionals that conduct themselves with pride and integrity. Our leagues culture develops our female athletes to strive to improve, persevere through adversity, sportsmanship and commit to be a team player to reach a common goal. Socal Girls Fastpitch has an essential role in the development of our young athletes to learn to take on greater goals in their lives and become leaders in their community. Socal Girls Fastpitch is proud of the role we have in our community and our youngathletes lives.
What it reported doing in 2023
Socal Giris Fastpitch provides a safe and friendly environment for young ladies to compete at all levels. We assist ladies with proper fundamentals in softball as well as academics. Our goal is to provide young ladies without the financial or athletic ability to play at any level beginner or experienced.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.9%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.4%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 111.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 40.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 70.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $100K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.