Snowline Health
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942678570
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Diamond Springs, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5306217820
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Hospices
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,088,588
- Expenses
- $21,517,760
- Assets
- $14,264,500
- Liabilities
- $5,577,165
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TIM MEADOWS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- JIM MCGREGOR MD (PRESIDENT)
- TRACY JACKSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JO DUNLAP (PAST PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TIM MEADOWS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $276,770 total reported compensation
- TAMARA GRIGOLEIT (DIRECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURANCE): $200,241 total reported compensation
- BILL WIEDEMANN (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $197,396 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To bring peace and dignity through life's transitions by providing comfort, care, and support to people in need.
What it reported doing in 2024
Clinical and thrift operations to support the provision of nursing and counseling services for critically ill and terminally ill patients and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.9%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.1%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.39; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.9% of revenue deployed · 86.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $277K · 22 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.