Snow Farm- the New England Craft Program Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 063547767
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Williamsburg, MA, USA
- Phone
- 4132683101
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,188,903
- Expenses
- $2,086,268
- Assets
- $2,104,549
- Liabilities
- $1,106,354
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANET DUNLAP (PRESIDENT)
- JIM ROSENTHAL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARY JO MURPHY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MARY JO MURPHY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $121,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide exceptional studio craft and fine art instruction for people of all ages in an inspiring residential setting. We offer an evolving, expansive community where every experience is intended to awaken and nourish the life-changing power of creativity.
What it reported doing in 2025
See schedule osnow farm: the new england craft program is a non-profit, residential craft school located in the hills of western Massachusetts. Snow farm is one of nine residential craft schools in the united states and the only one in Massachusetts. The organization offers 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-day workshops from late april through late october across eight studios: wood, ceramics, kiln/stained glass, painting/drawing, metals/jewelry, 3d, 2d, and textiles.2025 observations and operational highlights: opening day registration in january 2024 set a record for the highest single-day dollar amount of workshop registrations in the organization's history.snow farm continues to prioritize accessibility through programs including the work study program, workshop access program, high school scholarships, the new college craft connection initiative, and participation in the Massachusetts cultural council card to culture program.a capital project that began in late 2024, was completed in early 2025. A new accessible restroom was added between the 2d and 3d studio and plumbing to these two studios and the metalsmithing studio were brought up to code. A new garage door that keeps out the elements was added in 3d as well. All of these improvements improved the functionality of the studios.the snow farm team worked effectively and collaboratively throughout 2025, with no turnover among salaried employees. The program director took a three-month maternity leave at year-end. Staff remained fully committed to ensuring smooth workshop operations. For example, the studio manager is on-site every weekend programming is offered, significantly enhancing customer service for both students and instructors. This level of support contributed to a high number of positive program evaluations.separating the one-time $45 registration fee within the profit & loss statements enabled more accurate tracking of participation. Based on this adjustment, approximately 901 individuals participated in at least one workshop during 2025.behavioral health challenges among high school students required increased attention during the four-week high school program. The organization's mental health specialist was consulted multiple times for guidance and support. The intensity of this program on both the high school staff, the kitchen, and full-time staff led the executive director to propose reducing the program to one (2 week) session rather than two sessions in 2026. The goal is to deliver an a+ experience for the one (2 week) session. A donor contributed $15,000 toward the purchase of a new storage shed, which was installed behind the dormitory buildings.during 2025, snow farm offered a limited number of glass blowing workshops. Due to low student enrollment, rising operating expenses, significant technical requirements, and ongoing operating deficits, the executive director proposed the permanent closure of the glass blowing studio. The board reached consensus to close the studio at the end of 2025 and to dispose of the related equipment. In 2026, staff will present several viable options to the board for consideration regarding future use of space.snow farm utilized a $95,200 grant from the windgate foundation to purchase and install a larger generator capable of supporting the entire main building during power outages. This investment strengthens operational continuity during electrical disruptions.the seconds sale, held over three weekends in november 2025, achieved the highest sales in the event's history. The second's sale is snow farm's primary annual fundraising event. More than 250 artists consigned work for the three-weekend event, and over 2,800 community members attended. In 2025, snow farm paid more than $121,000 to participating artists for the sale of their work.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.3%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.3% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $122K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.