Snoqualmie Valley Shelter Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 815104730
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Snoqualmie, WA, USA
- Phone
- 4255485893
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,452,058
- Expenses
- $1,392,155
- Assets
- $1,142,732
- Liabilities
- $969,155
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER KIRK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- DON SCARAMASTRA (PRESIDENT)
- CHRIS BREEDS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER KIRK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $118,858 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Reclaim is a community resource providing pathways to stability, opportunity & connection.
What it reported doing in 2024
Gender-Based Violence Program: Reclaim, in partnership with the Snoqualmie Indian Tribe, provides emergency shelter and services for survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, sex trafficking, harassment, and stalking. The program serves women, men, and families, offering safe motel-based shelter, basic needs support, safety planning, and case management. In 2024, we sheltered 39 victim/survivors and 26 family members, providing a total of 3,114 bed-nights of safety and stability. Survivors also received referrals to counseling, legal assistance, advocacy, and housing resources. Unfortunately, due to limited funding, more than 60 additional victim/survivors seeking safety had to be turned away. This program fills a critical gap in the Snoqualmie Valley, where few local resources for gender-based violence survivors have previously existed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 81% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.5%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 77.7%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.1%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.85; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 45% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.5% of revenue deployed · 77.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $119K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.