Sno-king Amateur Hockey Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237275375
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2021, Form 990-T 2021
Location
Kirkland, WA, USA
Phone
4258217133
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,753,602
Expenses
$3,151,038
Assets
$16,128,676
Liabilities
$10,882,061

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JARETT GOODKIN (PRESIDENT)
  • ROB MAGUIRE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • LARRY MANA'O (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DOUG KIRTON (HOCKEY DIRECTOR): $125,222 total reported compensation
  • LARRY MANA'O (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $95,884 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To build and sustain the premier regional hockey program by providing quality education and training for the development and success of young people in hockey and life skills. We are building players for life!

What it reported doing in 2021

Skaha had record numbers of participants playing at the two facilities. The largest portion of this population plays recreational (rec) hockey, which allows them time to play other sports or participate in other activities. The remaining group plays representative (rep) hockey, which involves travel to canada and other states in the united states. Skaha offers programming for kids to learn to skate and play hockey and to be on teams to compete.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 75%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $41.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Limited
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.1%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.12; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.67; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63% of revenue deployed · 75% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $125K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.