Sno Angels Sno Mobile Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
010468124
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
St Francis, ME, USA
Phone
2073164653
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Winter Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$183,790
Expenses
$58,739
Assets
$258,687
Liabilities
$43,189

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID CONNORS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID CONNORS (PRESIDENT)
  • ERWIN JACKSON (VICE-PRESIDE)
  • KIM OUELLETTE (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To educate its members and the general public in the principles of safety in the use of snowmobiles. To promote better understanding between snowmobile owners and the general public as to the proper use of snowmobiles. To encourage the use of snowmobiles and the establishment of snowmobile trails in a manner that will result in a minimum effect on the environment. To promote among all snowmobilers a greater respect for the rights of landowners and aother winter sport enthusiasts. To encourage among its members and appreciation of the natural and scenic areas of our state and the need for thier protection. To promote community activites and involvement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 23.3%; rating input score 23
  • Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 68%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.4; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.4% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 95.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 57.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 23.3% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.