Snake River Juniors

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820487267
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Lewiston, ID, USA
Phone
2089836599
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,796
Expenses
$137,102
Assets
$98,165
Liabilities
$262

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

People named in this filing

  • KATIE BLEVINS (Treasurer)
  • RENI VANLEUVEN (Director)
  • MARNI HERRES (COORDINATOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the snake river juniors is to maintain a not-for-profit organization designed to foster the growth and development of youth volleyball in and around the lewis-clark valley. Snake river juniors volleyball club is committed to providing opportunities for young athletes at all levels of development to engage in quality, competitive athletic experiences.

What it reported doing in 2025

Snake river juniors provides a safe, positive envirnoment for local youth who want to improve their volleyball abilities. Almost 50 youth were put into teams to attend practice and tournaments around the valley. Snake river juniors also hosted an annual tournament to bring together youth teams around the area to play competitively. Different brackets were created based upon the team member's age and experience. The tournament has grown each year, and this year hosted over 15 teams to compete.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.6%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.6% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $123K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.