Smoke-free Gaming of America

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270980593
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Pompano Beach, FL, USA
Phone
3038193131
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Smoking Addiction

Reported finances

Revenue
$55,528
Expenses
$18,140
Assets
$326,518
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Stephanie Lane (Co-Chair)
  • Rodney Lane (Treasurer)
  • Terrie Price (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Smoke-Free Gaming of America educates the public about the health hazards of smoking and secondhand smoke exposure and advocates for smoke-free workplaces for the health benefits of employees who work in smoke-filled environments and the public. We utilize the help of volunteers to help in the advocacy and education process and we work with health-based organizations with similar goals.

What it reported doing in 2015

Increased advocacy, messaging an exposure via Facebook, Twitter, Email and other social media outlets. The general public and employees of gaming establishments across the U.S. that are now smoke free benefit from not breathing the toxic properties of secondhand smoke.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 89
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30.3%; rating input score 30
  • Program expense ratio: 92.8%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 67.3%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 18; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -42.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 28.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.3% of revenue deployed · 92.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.