Smith County Medical Society Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464233713
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Tyler, TX, USA
Phone
9035937058
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$4
Expenses
$175
Assets
$38,450
Liabilities
$683

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUMAN SINHA MD (PRESIDENT)
  • LI-YU MITCHELL MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • LISA ALLEN MD (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • ANGELA DRIGGS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • SUMAN SINHA MD (PRESIDENT)
  • LI-YU MITCHELL MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • LISA ALLEN MD (VICE-PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The smith county medical society foundation supports the legacy, outreach and advancement of the smith county medical society. In the spirit of philanthropy, the foundation's efforts impact physicians individually and collectively, while fostering a healthier community.the smith county medical society foundation was created as a supporting organization to the medical society. Its charitable purpose is to advance our medical society for the benefit of our physician members - individually and collectively - and the patients we serve.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide support for smith county medical society to provide education on health and medical related issues. From time to time sponsor health awareness events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4,275%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 219.71; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -42.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -24.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.