Smiley Studios
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841455120
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Durango, CO, USA
- Phone
- 9703551977
- Rating
- 35
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Visual Arts Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8
- Expenses
- $6,816
- Assets
- $160,201
- Liabilities
- $311
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIT FROST (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL MCQUINN (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KIT FROST (PRESIDENT)
- LISA SHAW (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
- MICHAEL MCQUINN (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Sponsor programs, workshops and programs with visiting artists and artists in residence. Provide facilities for others to promote the arts, provide a supportive working environment for all persons interested in the arts and to sponsor informational events, open to the public, with focus on the arts.
What it reported doing in 2023
Theatre facilities made available to general public. Display rooms made available to artists and individuals attending art showings and openings. 1,750 persons served.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -85,100%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 23.5; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -40% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -27.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.