Smhs Cheer Booster

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933709251
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Peoria, AZ, USA
Phone
6236702936
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$92,137
Expenses
$92,116
Assets
$3,255
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sherri Wallace (President)
  • Nicole Moore (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Sherri Wallace (President)
  • Nicole Moore (Vice President)
  • Brooke Kistner (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Booster club for high school cheer team, we provide positive and active support to 35 athletes and 5 coaches of Sunrise Mountain High School Cheer in Peoria AZ. We fundraise to support all cheer activities, collect payments from parents to bulk order gear, uniforms and all other related season costs and competition costs. We provide a holiday party, homecoming party, and end of season banquet. Our season is long and runs nearly year round with small breaks.

What it reported doing in 2025

Booster club for high school cheer team, we provide positive and active support to 29 athletes and 4 coaches of Sunrise Mountain High School Cheer in Peoria AZ. We fundraise to support all cheer activities, collect payments from parents to bulk order gear, uniforms and all other related season costs and competition costs. We provide a holiday party, homecoming party, and end of season banquet. Our season is long and runs nearly year round with small breaks.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.