Smart Reading
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931051724
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 9716341634
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Kindergarten, Preschool, Nursery School, Early Admissions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,550,736
- Expenses
- $4,576,791
- Assets
- $5,960,854
- Liabilities
- $596,684
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JESSICA BOWERSOX (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JESSICA BOWERSOX (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $176,842 total reported compensation
- SHARON BOSSERMAN-BENSON (SENIOR DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $117,500 total reported compensation
- MARY ALAYNA HERR (DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR): $89,819 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To spark joy and opportunity through the magic of a shared book.
What it reported doing in 2024
Smart reading is a nationally recognized, statewide nonprofit organization (incorporated in the state of Oregon) with a network of volunteers, educators, donors, and advocates across Oregon who are banding together to empower children for more successful futures through books and reading. Headquartered in portland, smart reading envisions an Oregon in which every child can realize their full potential through reading. Smart reading engages community volunteers to read one-on-one or in groups with prekindergarten through third grade children. Participating children also receive new books each month to keep and read with their families.smart reading partners with over 250 high need schools and head start programs across Oregon. Smart reading is overwhelmingly funded by private sources, and achieves this work by leveraging private dollars and public infrastructure to provide proven reading support and books for thousands of Oregon children. The intention of smart reading is to provide a fun, child-guided experience that builds reading skills, self-confidence, and a lifelong love of reading in children - and ensures all students have access to high-quality, inclusive books.during the year ended june 30, 2025, smart reading delivered books, provided classroom read-aloud opportunities, and/or one-on-one reading support to approximately 15,000 children and gave away approximately 125,000 books. This was possible, in part, thanks to over 750 volunteers, who together contributed approximately 10,000 hours of volunteer time.since 1992, smart reading has served over 275,000 children with the help of over 150,000 volunteers, and given away over 3.2 million books. Together, with support from communities across the state, smart reading is empowering Oregon children for reading and learning success.and we know the program works. An independent study by the eugene research institute reveals that fifth-graders who participated in smart reading as first-graders are 60 percent more likely to reach state reading benchmarks than are similar students who did not participate.smart reading students develop reading accuracy, fluency and comprehension significantly faster and maintain these gains even after completing the program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 71.6%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.6 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -28.9%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 71.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $177K · 20 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.