Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363756240
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Vienna, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7032425840
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,379,944
- Expenses
- $1,113,775
- Assets
- $931,899
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Karen Kerrigan (President/Secretary)
Highest reported compensation
- Karen Kerrigan (President/Secretary): $286,206 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
SBE Council works to promote entrepreneurship and protect small business. SBE Council advocates for entrepreneurs and stronger entrepreneurship by encouraging policies, legislative solutions and private-sector initiatives that improve the ecosystem and climate for business startup and growth. SBE Council conducts research and educational campaigns and engages directly with elected and government officials, small business owners and business leaders, educators, the media, and the policy community to achieve these goals. We create and distribute educational content for entrepreneurs and those individuals who want to start businesses to help them succeed in the marketplace, and to become effective advocates for their businesses.
What it reported doing in 2024
Research & Analysis: SBE Council produced research reports, small business surveys, issue briefs and analysis on issues that helped to keep elected officials, policy leaders in government, entrepreneurs, the media and general public better informed on the importance of entrepreneurship and small businesses to the U.S. economy and how small firms and business creation are impacted by specific policies that are being proposed or advanced. In addition to the regular daily content authored by SBE Council's economic team (147 briefs were produced for the year), various special reports and research included our "Small Business Check Up Survey" (produced quarterly) to better help government officials understand how small businesses were navigating key issues and market events such as inflation, artificial intelligence (AI), workforce shortages, tariffs, uncertainty with regard to expiring tax credits and measures, capital access challenges, and rapid digitization. The "Checkup Survey" produced important and timely data, which played a role in helping lawmakers, policy leaders and the media better understand small business priorities, how they were responding to challenges and current economic and market conditions, their outlook on their own financial performance, emerging tech and digital tools they were using and the measurable benefits, and where they stand on key issues. SBE Council also produced regular updates and analysis on the historic growth in new business applications and small business tech adoption. Our "Small Business Technology Use Survey 2025" reported on their broad use of artificial intelligence (AI) and how that impacted their workforce and competitiveness, and other digital tools and social media platforms demonstrating their embrace of omni-channel strategies and AI to compete with larger players, operate more efficiently, reach more consumers and drive sales, and to innovate. The Technology Use survey helped policymakers better understand the benefits of the technology and served to check the "doom and gloom" outcomes that some were predicting. SBE Council's daily and weekly economic briefs and blog posts helped both small business owners and members of Congress better understand the data and trends produced in regular government economic reports - such as the monthly jobs report, new business applications data, and monthly reports on trade, manufacturing, consumer credit, productivity, consumer confidence, the Federal Reserve Beige Book and durable goods reports. Members of Congress and their staffs, experts within the Administration, federal regulatory agencies and the media regularly sought and utilized our data, reports and analysis for their own reporting or policymaking purposes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.9%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 81.6%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.3%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.9% of revenue deployed · 81.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $909K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $286K · 3 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.