Smacna-New York State Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133592031
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Newburgh, NY, USA
Phone
8455624280
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$73,750
Expenses
$92,232
Assets
$48,516
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM FREESE (PRESIDENT)
  • LOU DORO (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WILLIAM FREESE (PRESIDENT)
  • LOU DORO (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MELISSA BARBOUR (EXEC DIRECTOR, TREASURER,)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Smacna-New York state, inc. (the organization) was established to serve sheet metal contractors associations within the state for the purpose of advancing the sheet metal industry through securing the corporation of various persons and firms engaged in such businesses, and collecting, correlating and disseminating information of value to them through the medium of the state association. The organization will also provide adequate and necessary state representation on behalf of these industries in dealing with government agencies, other industry groups, representatives of labor and representatives of the public as well as initiate, promote and document studies directed toward the solution of present and future problems relevant to these industries.

What it reported doing in 2024

To promote programs of industry education, training and to administration of collective barganing agreements. To research and promote such programs serving to expand the market for the sheetmetal industry. To improve the technical and business skills of employers, stabilize and improve employer-union relations, and promote support and improve the training and employment opportunities for employees.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -25.1%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.