Slavic International Association of Ministries Good Samaritan

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911719293
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Federal Way, WA, USA
Phone
2538749885
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$283,976
Expenses
$331,253
Assets
$27,701
Liabilities
$10,762

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • YURIY RADCHUK (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • PETER RADCHUK (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • PETER RADCHUK (PRESIDENT): $57,600 total reported compensation
  • LILIYA SMAL (MARKETING MANAGER): $21,000 total reported compensation
  • ANNA KIFORISHIN (TREASURER): $15,960 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To help meet the social, physical, and spiritual needs of suffering people especially widows, orphans, and victims of poverty, war, and natural disasters through mercy-based programs, education, and evangelism.

What it reported doing in 2024

We enable church planting through monthly missionary support of more than two dozen missionaries. Funds are also allocated to cover essential ministry-related needs, including children's and youth programs, aid for the elderly and people with disabilities, community-building events such as hosting medical clinics and holding marriage seminars, transportation costs, rent, literature printing and distribution, and humanitarian aid. Additionally, missionary conferences and seminars are organized annually for training and reporting purposes. During the holiday season, thousands of christmas gifts are distributed. Humanitarian aid is distributed to needy families living near the frontlines and to displaced families due to the war. Special events are organized to support new war widows and their families in different regions. The project includes the purchase and transportation of firewood for the most affected areas, as well as the cost of ingredients for baking bread and preparing fresh meals for emergency distribution. Spiritual and practical assistance is provided to military chaplains. The cost of fuel was covered for multiple cross-country trips aimed at providing emergency supplies for people near occupied territories.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 63
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 70.3%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -16.6%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.39; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82% of revenue deployed · 70.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $233K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $58K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.