Skating Club of Novi
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383440591
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Novi, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2483471010
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Camps
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $90,300
- Expenses
- $88,200
- Assets
- $86,810
- Liabilities
- $100
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CARMEN SZUTARSKI (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CARMEN SZUTARSKI (PRESIDENT)
- LAURA PAREDES (VICE PRESIDE)
- DIANA TIEU (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purposes of the club are to encourage the instruction, practice and advancement of the members in free skating, pair skating, dancing and all types of figure skating: to encourage and cultivate a spirit of fraternal feeling among ice skaters; to sponsor, to produce, or to cooperate in the productions of amateur ice shows and generally to do and perform such other acts as may be necessary, advisable, proper or incidental in the realization of the objects and purposes of this organization; and to carry out the general policies of the unites states figure skating association.
What it reported doing in 2024
Hosted ice skating events including an annual ice show, summer chill basic skills competition, annual holiday exhibition, and holds several usfsa testing sessions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.8%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 95.9%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.8% of revenue deployed · 95.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $85K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.