Sitia

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770455470
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Mountain View, CA, USA
Phone
6508337061
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
International Agricultural Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$0
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Daniel Callahan (Executive Director)
  • June A Flora (President)

People named in this filing

  • Georg Lindsey (Board Member)
  • Ken Novak (Board Member)
  • David Balson (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

SITIA is a non-profit 501(c)3 organization based in the USA. We are dedicated to promoting and enhancing sustainable agricultural practices and natural resource conservation through the development and deployment of appropriate information technologies. We believe that enhanced economic development in agricultural and rural communities is dependent on promoting strong, sustainable agricultural and forestry practices. The successful implementation and use of these practices are heavily dependent on information access and management. SITIA provides information technology solutions that help to ensure farmers, extension workers, scientists and others access, organize, publish and exchange agricultural information. We work both nationally and internationally, in both developed and developing countries, to better improve speed and accuracy of information access and to provide alternatives by which agricultural information can be published and disseminated.

What it reported doing in 2022

SITIA is providing high-level computer and network technical support to population experts in Sub-Saharan Africa and in South Asia.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Sustainability: NotEnoughData
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -52.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -30.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -32.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2011 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series filing activity did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.