Sister Soldier-stand Up for Each Other Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461839912
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
5164348599
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,834
Expenses
$9,735
Assets
$8,016
Liabilities
$2,795

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATRICIA OTTAVIANO (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PATRICIA OTTAVIANO (PRESIDENT)
  • CRISTINA OTTAVIANO (TREASURER)
  • LESLIE OTTAVIANO (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Conducting school assemblies the organization hosts assemblies at middle schools and high schools across the united states, for female students in grades 5-12. Lectures are about girl against girl bullying and the purpose of the assemblies is to bring healing and awareness to the often mean and hurtful ways girls treat one another.

What it reported doing in 2019

Promoting and education against girl-on-girl bullying

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 30.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.