Sister S Returning Home Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272213450
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2159004202
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Rehabilitation Services for Offenders

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$173,850
Expenses
$176,350
Assets
$39,982

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARCUS VON HEPITAUL (PRESIDENT)
  • AMY DONNELLA (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARCUS VON HEPITAUL (PRESIDENT)
  • KELLSEY TURNER (SECRETARY)
  • AYANNA WILLIAMS (LEGAL COUNSEL)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sisters returning home (srh) provides support for women re-entering society after being released from prison. Srh provides mentoring[: comma:] workforce development and advocacy programs for women. Srh advocates for the fair treatment of women in the criminal justice system.

What it reported doing in 2019

Sisters returning home project for advocacy consisted of (25 )women and their families at state representative steve kinsey office. The women spoke of the lack of resource facing them when returning from prison such as housing employment medical assistance. Sisters returning home partner with students from villanova to prepare the women to advocate through letters writing social media and meeting with the state representative face to face. The women spoke on opportunities that are geared more to men than women who are facing the same challenges try to support their families. The family members spoke about the economical impact of the criminal justice system on their lives and children. Sisters returning home will continue working with the women returning back into our community and their families to improve the quality of life for our women

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.4%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 51.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -21.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2016 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.