Sister City Committee Beverly Hills/cannes C/o Kuperstein Ong

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
954120561
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
3102776800
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
International Cultural Exchange

Reported finances

Expenses
$25
Assets
$2,506
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAUL D KUPERSTEIN (PRESIDENT & TREASURER)

People named in this filing

  • PAUL D KUPERSTEIN (PRESIDENT & TREASURER)
  • PAUL D KUPERSTEIN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To develop, stimulate and promote an appreciation of the arts, philosophy and commerce of the residents of the cities of beverly hills, ca & cannes, fr to establish a relationship between the beverly hills chamber of commerce and the cannes prestige association.

What it reported doing in 2024

We continued to arrange for fireman exchange between the city of cannes france and beverly hills . In additon we worked on a french chef exchage between the two sister cities for at one of the major hotels in beverly hills. We are working on a schedule with a young performance group between the ages of 9 - 15 to come to beverly hills and perform their stage production of around the world in 80 days in the new theater arts building which will be open to the general public free of cost.also we are working on a recital by the national conservatory of music of cannes, france to perform in beverly hills and los angeles, taking students from beverly hills to cannes, france for music recitals.no activity this year due to covid 19 and through 2025

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 100.24; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.