Sistema Infantil Teleton USA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464845389
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Antonio, TX, USA
Phone
2102576260
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Rehabilitative Medical Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,777,667
Expenses
$5,289,323
Assets
$2,506,266
Liabilities
$800,355

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PEDRO FERNANDO LANDEROS VERDUGO (PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN)
  • FEDERICA SORIANO (CEO/PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • CYNTHIA RILEY (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $343,922 total reported compensation
  • FEDERICA SORIANO (CEO/PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $199,722 total reported compensation
  • SHELIZA ROSENTHAL (COO): $128,952 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sistema infantil teleton USA, dba children's rehabilitation institute teletonusa (crit), has a mission to elevate the quality of life for children with neurological, muscular, and skeletal disabilities and their families through an integrated, state-of-the-art rehabilitation program. This program empowers patients to reach their full potential and achieve inclusion in society, regardless of their ability to pay. Our motto is "love and science in the service of life."

What it reported doing in 2024

The children's rehabilitation institute of teleton USA (criti) is a nonprofit pediatric outpatient rehabilitation facility in san antonio, Texas, for children ages 18 and under. Crit serves children with neurological, muscular and skeleton disabilities through an integrated and state of the art rehabilitation program. Crit offers a variety of rehabilitation services on a daily basis. Crit has capacity for 450 patients and is currently serving 358 patients from 14 states of the united states of america. Patient's rehabilitation objectives will be set by both the attending phvsician and the patient's family at the beginning of the treatment period. The crit model states that family members must learn the exercises or know the suggestions that our center provides to continue once the family has left our facilities. Rehabilitation services at crit are paid by insurance or on a pay what you can method according to their means and each and every one of crit's patients and families receive physical, psychological, social and spiritual support. During 2024, crit issued approximately 19,242 appointments. 256 patients had their initial appointments and 239 patients were discharged during 2024. The organization also received $1,236,857 of in-kind rent during 2024.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.3%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 75.8%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.5%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.3% of revenue deployed · 75.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $344K · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 27/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.