Siskiyou Mutual Aid Cooperative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843747394
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Talent, OR, USA
Phone
5412364335
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$50,842
Expenses
$19,386
Assets
$116,739

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Alex Budd (President)

People named in this filing

  • Alex Budd (President)
  • Grace Pettygrove (Secretary)
  • Holly Mills (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Siskiyou Mutual Aid is a volunteer community association that provides material and financial support to individuals and grassroots organizations. Our goal is to empower communities to create solutions to the problems of systemic injustice, supporting individual, organizational and community driven efforts focused on climate justice, as well as mutual aid, and economic, racial and disability justice.

What it reported doing in 2024

We provided support for Judi's Midnight Diner, a volunteer-run mobile warming shelter. Judi's meets essential needs for community members who lack housing security by providing weekly meals, warmth, survival supplies and a place to gather. We assisted individuals and groups involved in organizing for climate justice as well as mutual aid, economic, racial and disability justice.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 35.6%; rating input score 36
  • Program expense ratio: 93.3%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 61.9%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.02; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -33.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 65.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 35.6% of revenue deployed · 93.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.