Siskiyou Humane Society Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942411106
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Mount Shasta, CA, USA
Phone
5309264052
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$586,858
Expenses
$858,519
Assets
$1,529,267
Liabilities
$19,956

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROCHELLE DUNMORE (PRESIDENT/DI)
  • LINN TYHURST (PRESIDENT/DI)

Highest reported compensation

  • AUSTIN BROWDER (EXECUTIVE DI): $73,789 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the lives of companion animals by sheltering, rehabilitating, reducing pet overpopulation and finding permanent homes. We promote responsible pet ownership, kindness to animals, and enhancement of human- animal relationships through education and outreach.

What it reported doing in 2025

Sheltering, rehabilitating, and finding homes: in 2025, the siskiyou humane society (shs) sheltered 710 animals and helped many find their forever homes. Adoptions increased significantly, rising from 322 in 2024 to 485 in 2025. Dog adoptions alone grew from 109 in 2024 to 202 in 2025. This growth was driven in part by the expansion of our mt. Shasta adoption center, which is now open seven days a week, allowing us to better serve the community and connect more families with adoptable pets. Throughout the year, shs also hosted or participated in 30 adoption, outreach, and education events across the community. Foster program: shs strengthened its foster program by expanding outreach efforts across multiple social media platforms to recruit foster families. We provide foster families with all necessary supplies, along with ongoing support and guidance to help ensure successful placements for the animals in our care. Keep them home program: shs continues to support low-income and underserved communities through outreach programs designed to help families keep their pets during times of financial hardship. In 2023, we opened our community pet resource center in yreka to expand access to essential resources for pet owners in need. Through the yreka resource center and our adoption center in mt. Shasta, we provide pet food and basic supplies to local families. In 2025 alone, shs distributed 1,315 pounds of pet food to community members in need, helping pets remain in their homes and reducing the need for owner surrenders. Behavior training and counseling: shs provided free behavior consultations for cats and dogs to support pet owners facing behavioral challenges. We offered training guidance, behavior management strategies, and educational resources to help families address problem behaviors, strengthen the human-animal bond, and keep pets safely in their homes. Pet deposit program: shs assists senior citizens by helping cover pet rental deposits, enabling them to keep their beloved pets while securing stable housing. This support helps preserve the important companionship and emotional benefits that pets provide to seniors. Education and volunteer program: shs provided shelter tours and educational presentations to local students to promote animal welfare, responsible pet ownership, and community involvement. We also supported countywide high school students completing senior community service projects and welcomed participants from the college of the siskiyous upward bound program through their work experience program. In addition, shs recorded more than 7,100 volunteer hours in 2025. Dedicated volunteers, including regular dog walkers and kitty socializers, help enrich the lives of our shelter animals while they await their forever homes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $188.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -46.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.78; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $791K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $74K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.