Single Parents with Ms Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850706287
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Oceanport, NJ, USA
Phone
9083097036
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Reported finances

Revenue
$143,684
Expenses
$141,338
Assets
$241,000
Liabilities
$3,130

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DARRELL WORDELMANN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

People named in this filing

  • ROBERT WORDELMANN (BOARD MEMBER)
  • MAUREEN BUTLER (BOARD MEMBER)
  • EUGENIA LAWSON (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support the critical needs of people and their families living with multiple sclerosis or ms to transform, improve and maintain their quality of life. To provide ms families with full or partial financial assistance, including without limitation, for education, medications and other daily needs and household essentials. To support, promote and develop social, educational, scientific and charitable programs to assist single parents and their family members living with ms face the physical, emotional and financial challenges of the disease.

What it reported doing in 2025

Financial and other needed assistance to single parents and their families living with multiple sclerosis or ms

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 70% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 1
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.1%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: 1.1%; rating input score 1

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.6%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.6%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -75.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 27.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 36.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.1% of revenue deployed · 1.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.