Sing Out and READ
Legal name: Sing Out and Read Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800731246
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Clearwater, FL, US
- Phone
- (813) 704-2397
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Remedial Reading, Reading Encouragement
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $810,498
- Expenses
- $848,285
- Assets
- $42,826
- Liabilities
- $37,323
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAY GRAHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JAY GRAHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $27,552 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ending illiteracy through the power of singing
What it reported doing in 2025
Sing out and read (soar) continued its mission in 2025 to improve literacy outcomes for struggling young readers through its innovative, evidence-based reading intervention that combines music, technology, and family engagement. The organization's flagship soar program provides qualifying elementary-aged children with a tablet preloaded with proprietary sing-to-read software, a headset with microphone, internet connectivity as needed, individualized coaching, and ongoing family support at no cost to participating families.(continued on schedule o)the soar program is designed to help children who are reading below grade level develop fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, and reading confidence through structured, music-based instruction. Students participate in a 12-week program requiring approximately 90 minutes of weekly practice, while trained soar coaches monitor participation, encourage families, recognize milestones, and provide accountability to help students complete the program successfully.during 2025, sing out and read served approximately 30 cohorts, serving 511 children and their families through the soar program throughout pinellas and hillsborough counties. The organization distributed tablets and learning materials, provided individualized coaching and progress monitoring, and partnered with schools, community organizations, and philanthropic supporters to expand access to evidence-based literacy intervention for children at risk of reading failure.the organization's program continued to emphasize measurable outcomes through ongoing collection and evaluation of participant data, including software usage, lesson completion, reading assessments, and school-based performance measures when available. These data are used to monitor student progress, improve program implementation, demonstrate program effectiveness, and ensure accountability to funders and community partners.the soar methodology is supported by research conducted through the university of south Florida and subsequent validation studies demonstrating that students who complete the program with fidelity can achieve significant improvements in reading proficiency in a relatively short period of time. By combining repeated oral reading, music, vocabulary development, and engaging technology, the program helps children build both literacy skills and confidence while creating positive reading habits that extend beyond program completion.throughout 2025, sing out and read also continued to strengthen its organizational capacity by expanding community awareness, cultivating strategic partnerships, and increasing philanthropic support to position the organization for future growth and expansion into additional communities. These efforts support the organization's long-term goal of making its evidence-based literacy intervention available to more struggling readers throughout Florida and ultimately across the united states.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.8%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 83.9%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.7%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.87; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 87.8% of revenue deployed · 83.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $712K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $28K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.