Simi Valley Hospital Foundation Dba Adventist Health Simi Valley Fdtn

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
912135595
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Simi Valley, CA, USA
Phone
8059556670
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$268,454
Expenses
$81,093
Assets
$1,226,509
Liabilities
$56,000

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LaBorde Elizabeth (President)
  • Stiles Kathryn (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Issai Alice (Board Member): $1,210,992 total reported compensation
  • Swenson Jennifer (Board Member): $816,057 total reported compensation
  • Shepardson Dean eff 824 (Treasurer): $745,711 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Simi Valley Hospital Foundation provides inspiration and opportunity for donors to assist Simi Valley Hospital in fulfilling its mission to provide high quality compassionate care.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Simi Valley Hospital Foundation is an IRC 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Our purpose is to support the mission of Simi Valley Hospital and Health Services in improving the quality of life and health in our community. We do this by:1. Building strong philanthropic support to meet capital and funding needs of the hospital.2. Ensuring appropriate stewardship by demonstrating an ethical and fiduciary responsibility to our donors and supporters.3. Developing excellent relationships with the community at large, and within the hospital in order to support our ministry of philanthropy.4. Working with community partners, organizations and volunteers.The following story illustrates how Adventist Health Simi Valley works to provide quality care for our community and why our Foundation has such a passion for raising funds to continue improving the care we can provide: For many men, the symptoms of an enlarged prostate (BPH) can creep in gradually small inconveniences that eventually turn into major disruptions. That was the case for a dedicated sports coach and father of two, Jay Garcia, who found himself struggling with frequent urination, discomfort and sleepless nights. His journey led him to Desiree Sanchez, MD, a trusted urologist at Adventist Health Simi Valley, and ultimately to life-changing relief through aquablation therapy.As a full-time sports coach, his days were packed with practices, games and mentoring athletes. But off the field, Jay's health was beginning to have an impact on his daily life in ways he couldnt ignore.I couldnt fully relax until I was home. Throughout the day, I managed to keep things under control, but once I was home, the urgency became overwhelming, he recalls. Nights were even worse waking up four to five times a night, sleep deprivation became his new normal. I couldnt remember the last time I had more than two hours of uninterrupted sleep.Like many men, Jay tried to manage the condition on his own staying active, eating healthy and even relying on an urgent care physician for routine checkups. But after years of makeshift solutions and costly visits that didnt yield long-term results, he realized he needed a specialist. Thats when he was referred to Dr. Sanchez.Meeting Dr. Sanchez was a turning point. She asked the right questions, made it easy to talk about, and helped me understand this wasnt something I could just fix on my own. Her words stuck with him: Youre going to love who you become.With her guidance, he moved forward with surgery, expecting a traditional procedure for BPH. It wasnt until after his operation that he learned he had undergone aquablation therapy a cutting-edge, minimally invasive treatment using the power of water to precisely remove excess prostate tissue.I was excited and focused on the day after surgery, he says. Any nerves he had disappeared once he experienced the warmth and professionalism of the Adventist Health Simi Valley team. They put socks on my feet, made me feel comfortable and took incredible care of me. I was worried about things that never even happened.Post-surgery, he was amazed at the difference. While there was some discomfort, it was nothing compared to what he had endured before. Within three days, he was back on the baseball field, feeling like himself again.Now, just months after the procedure, Jay feels like a new man. 100% I love who Ive become. He no longer rushes to the bathroom mid-practice or mid-conversation. He can bend over without discomfort. Most importantly, he can finally sleep through the night.For years, he had been hesitant to seek treatment, believing he could manage on his own. Being Latino, I was resistant. I minimized it; I tried to handle it myself. But we only know what we know until someone talks to us about something different.Now, as he looks ahead, he cant believe how much better he feels already. At one month, I felt pretty good. At two months, I feel great. I cant imagine what three months and beyond will feel li

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 46.2%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 88.6%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $46.01 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 69.8%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.12; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 475.8%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46.2% of revenue deployed · 88.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 22 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $72K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 25 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.