Silverado Junior Golf Organization Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991359038
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Napa, CA, USA
Phone
8034140807
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$42,951
Expenses
$41,857
Assets
$48,121

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Legia Oswald (President)
  • Kayla Walters (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Legia Oswald (President)
  • Kayla Walters (Vice President)
  • Sandra Simon (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

SJGO is dedicated to providing diverse opportunities for Napa Valley juniors to discover and embrace golf from an early age, supporting their journey through high school, college and beyond, and fostering a lifelong passion for the game.

What it reported doing in 2025

JUNIOR GOLF TOURNAMENT - Sponsored the 1st Annual SJGO High School Girls Scramble at Silverado Resort in Napa, CA at no cost to the participants or the coaches. Nine Bay Area High Schools participated from Vintage High School, Justin-Siena High School, American Canyon High School, San Leandro High School, St Patrick-St Vincent High School, Acalanes High School, Albany High School, College Park High School, and Arroyo High School with 45 junior golfers attending.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.3%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.15; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 79.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -38% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.3% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $31K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.