Silver Santa
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473054433
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Waelder, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5129249638
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Gift Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,456
- Expenses
- $2,047
- Assets
- $12,223
- Liabilities
- $2,047
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- Guy Benson (Director)
- Mike Elliott (Director)
- Brooke Cox (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to provide support to individuals with disabilities and the elderly.
What it reported doing in 2021
In 2021, we assisted 1,984 low Income Seniors & Veterans: Austin VA Center: 1,000Bastrop Nursing Center: 100Gracy Woods Nursing Center: 95San Antonio VA Center: 300Oakcrest Manor Nursing Home: 75Walnut Hills Nursing Home: 76Stone Briar Nursing Home: 102Southpark Meadows Nursing: 152Silver Pines Nursing & Rehab: 84
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 33
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 18%; rating input score 18
- Program expense ratio: 56.7%; rating input score 57
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 68.3%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.97; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -43.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -25.7% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 18% of revenue deployed · 56.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.