Silicon Valley Harvest

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208002489
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
San Jose, CA, USA
Phone
4082038275
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protestant
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$177,459
Expenses
$130,537
Assets
$3,330,070
Liabilities
$2,969,762

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KUO-WEI CHANG (CEO / BOARD)

People named in this filing

  • SAM MA (CSO / BOARD)
  • KUO-WEI CHANG (CEO / BOARD)
  • AMANDA MA (CFO / BOARD)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote christianity through marketplace ministry by providing religious instruction in the work place during weekdays. To provide a place of public worship and prayer. To engage in missions, evangelism, baptism and discipleship.

What it reported doing in 2024

Ministries are conducted through the name "operation @cloud".in may 2024, @cloud emba held an open house with in-person and online attendees to promote marketplace mentorship to equip participants to make an impact in their work places.on youtube, search videos for "@cloud emba 2024"the emba mentor circles program (june 2024 - november 2024) provided group mentorship to over 60 participants divided into 4 groups (circles) with the focus on 4 areas:- entrepreneurship and life- mission and ministry- business and career advancement- apostolic leadershipall the mentorship meetings were conducted online over zoom video conferencing.team building events occurred with hybrid format (both in-person and zoom meeting) to enhance the effect of networking.church incubator program: currently svh hosts three churches at 2586 seaboard avenue in san jose.svh community prayer altar: monthly gathering with svh church tenants to pray for the revival.flag dance worship: sisters in svh have bi weekly gatherings to practice and prepare to lead or join worship events during various christian festivals including but not limited to easter, thanksgiving, pentecost, passover, christmas and hanukkah.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 80% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.9%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.4%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 25.51; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.89; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 30.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.9% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $119K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.