Silicon Valley Association Of
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770447464
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2009
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2009
- Location
- So San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4086909920
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $231,938
- Expenses
- $298,592
- Assets
- $256,226
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educating entrepenuers
What it reported doing in 2009
SVASE strives to deliver new resources and programs to meet the needs of its dynamic entrepreneur, investor ans service community members in Silicon Valley. SVASE's accomplishments during the year included the following:-Held over 90 events in the past 12 months, attended by over 3,070 people, aimed at educating current and potential entrepreneurs on the most effectiveways to develop viable technology, life science and clean tech based businesses, and how to raise the venture capital required to fund them.-By leveraging SVASE events to present business cases and connect with potential investors, SVASE members have raised over $140M in venture capital since Jan 2008.-30 companies a year have the opportunity to launch their products in front of an audience of over 400 VCs, angels, corporate executives, bloggers, press and TV camera crews. Over 67% of these companies continue to operate and grow, creating new jobs, and in 2010, 2 of these companies were acquired by McAfee and GameStop respectively.-As an internationally acknowledged leader in entrepreneurship, SVASE is regularly asked to meet with delegations of government officials, industryleaders, investors and entrepreneurs from around the world. In 2010, SVASE met with delegations from France, Indonesia, Japan, Moldova, New Zealand, Spain and the UK.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -28.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $112K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.