Silas-s Duck Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991355351
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Taylorsville, NC, USA
- Phone
- 8282917242
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,875
- Expenses
- $3,760
- Assets
- $7,513
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TAMMY CAUDILL (PRESIDENT)
- PHYLLIS MASKALUK (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TAMMY CAUDILL (PRESIDENT)
- PHYLLIS MASKALUK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SANDY MILLER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our purpose at silas's duck foundation is to provide support to families who are dealing with childhood cancer. We aim to provide, unite, fund and generate efforts committed to the betterment, improvement of those families who are impacted by childhood cancer. We serve this purpose through partnerships and connections achieved online and directly within the community. Our goal is to establish support resources, financial assistance, scholarships and mental health programs for these families who have been impacted directly by pediatric cancers.
What it reported doing in 2025
This emergency fund provides financial assistance to newly diagnosed families facing childhood cancer. In the first month of treatment, parents often struggle with overwhelming medical schedules, leading to forgotten bills and essential service disruptions. To prevent this, we offer direct payments to service providers for critical expenses, ensuring stability during this difficult time. Families must apply, and funding is capped unless a dire need is demonstrated.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 18
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29.1%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.3%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 52.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 29.1% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.