Sight Savers of America Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300188234
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Pelham, AL, USA
- Phone
- 2059422627
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,870,267
- Expenses
- $4,852,260
- Assets
- $2,412,986
- Liabilities
- $154,917
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAWN DECARLO OD MS MSPH (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DAWN DECARLO OD MS MSPH (CEO): $227,326 total reported compensation
- CHAD NICHOLS (CDO): $132,933 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER WILLIAMS (CPO): $123,868 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To identify and secure treatment for unmet vision and health needs that impede a individual's ability to reach their full potential in school and in life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Sight savers america (ssa) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to identifying and securing essential eye care needs for children and adults, from a child's first pair of eyeglasses to extensive sight-saving treatment and high-tech vision AIDS for individuals with severe visual impairment. Serving 16 states, ssa fulfills its mission through three core programs: the eye care program, low vision & blindness program, and screening program. Ssa operates with a board of trustees, a staff of 40, and a nationwide network of more than 1,300 eye care professionals who often discount or donate services to support ssa programs. Through partnerships with local communities, schools, healthcare providers, state agencies, and other organizations, ssa reduces health disparities by ensuring individuals have access to essential vision services, treatments, and assistive technology.the eye care program identifies and addresses unmet eye care needs among children following failed school vision screenings or referrals from community partners, school staff, medical professionals, and family members. Once referred, each child receives individualized case management to ensure access to a dilated eye exam and all recommended treatments. Approximately 1 in 4 children in the u.s. Are estimated to have some form of vision problem, and vision disorders are among the most prevalent disabling childhood conditions, impacting development, learning, and quality of life.ssa's national follow-up eye care model works with families individually to connect children with a local eye care provider for an initial exam and ongoing care through their 19th birthday. Each child is assigned a case specialist who manages the entire process, including communicating screening results, educating families about the importance of ongoing eye care, scheduling appointments, providing reminders, arranging transportation when needed, and coordinating prescribed treatments. Treatments may include prescription eyeglasses, amblyopia treatment, medications, vision therapy, ongoing care, and surgeries. All program activity is documented in ssa's proprietary database, allowing ssa to track outcomes, support returning families, and provide detailed reporting to funders and stakeholders. Insurance coverage is utilized when applicable, and services not covered by insurance are donated or paid by ssa. Case specialists also assist uninsured families with applications for the children's health insurance program (chip). Ssa collaborates with state agencies to provide follow-up eye care through statewide vision programs, including Alabama's program serving all kindergarten, second, and fourth-grade public school students; Mississippi's program serving all public school kindergartners; and South Carolina's program supporting preschool-aged children statewide. To date, approximately 1 million children have been helped through the eye care program in Alabama, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Texas, and North Carolina. During the 2024/25 school year, 44,186 children received these services.the low vision & blindness program supports children and adults with severe visual impairment or blindness by providing high-tech visual assistive devices to individuals with a documented medical and financial need. The program's goal is to maximize remaining vision, increase functional abilities, and improve independence. Individuals with low vision or blindness often face significant challenges with daily activities such as reading, writing, traveling, education, employment, and independent living. These devices are essential but are not covered by medical insurance and are cost-prohibitive for many families. Ssa works with teachers of the visually impaired, low vision specialists, community organizations, state agencies, and other partners to identify individuals who may benefit from assistive technology. Each recipient receives individualized case management and must have a recent eva
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.8%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 88.1%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.5%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.8% of revenue deployed · 88.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $227K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.