Sierra Oaks School Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 753009613
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010, Form 990-EZ 2009
- Location
- Oracle, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 5208963100
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Charter Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $447,726
- Expenses
- $433,219
- Assets
- $114,194
- Liabilities
- $13,552
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To educate the youth of organization's community using a creative mix of modern technology, personalized education, the arts and old fashioned one-room schoolhouse values.
What it reported doing in 2010
Charter school
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 96% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 55
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.2%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.7%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 4 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $327K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $23K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.