CMM (Christ’s Mandate for Missions)
Legal name: Sidney & Helen Correll Ministries Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 561220026
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Phone
- 704-225-3927
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $924,233
- Expenses
- $930,097
- Assets
- $46,555
- Liabilities
- $20,133
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jorge Parrott (President)
- Anna Parrott (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Jorge Parrott (President): $65,700 total reported compensation
- Anna Parrott (Vice President): $48,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Love, Equip, Send, and Connect—fulfilling the Great Commission to make disciples of all nations (not just converts), including calling to every cultural and social center of influence (family, arts, entertainment, business, education, government, media, and religion). > “Makes sense! Partnering with others who share your vision to support ministry – not as intimidating as ‘asking for money’.” > “I love the supernatural of mission work…being like Christ on a mission trip, healing miracles etc” > “Good emphasis on ‘power’ of Jesus rather than just spreading the gospel”. If you have a group who desire to learn more from CMM we will arrange a faciltator for leading groups with real world experience led by the Holy Spirit including prophetic evangelism and leadership training to go to one of the 70 nations where CMM has established missionaries and projects you can visit short, mid, or...
What it reported doing in 2024
CMM raises funds, handles donor relations for national pastors, missionaries & workers in many nations and handles communications with donors & missionaries in 50 countries. CMM helps raise funds for the construction of churches, schools, hospitals & clinics, as well as humanitarian & water projects. CMM coordinates short and long term mission trips, logistics, event planning and travel arrangements for many churches & individuals to visit and help missionaries in the field. CMM is interdenominational & cross cultural in nature.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $96.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.3%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 80.2% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $742K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $66K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.