Sideline Supporters Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 393035132
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Simi Valley, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3035894373
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $37,864
- Expenses
- $16,503
- Assets
- $21,361
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER BANNON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
People named in this filing
- MACKENZIE KEENER (SECRETARY)
- DANIELA GILMORE (TREASUER)
- JENNIFER BANNON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Sideline supporters booster club is organized and operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. The organization's purpose is to support and enhance youth athletic programs by providing financial assistance, equipment, facilities support, and volunteer coordination. Its mission is to promote sportsmanship, teamwork, and community involvement while ensuring student-athletes have access to safe, inclusive, and well-supported athletic opportunities. No part of the organization's net earnings inures to the benefit of any private individual, and it does not participate in political or substantial lobbying activities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Sideline supporters supported multiple teams in launching fundraising initiatives to help offset the costs of tournament participation and travel, and provide financial relief to families. Sideline supporters connected young athletes with varsity high school players who provided skills training, mentorship, and firsthand advice about advancing to the next level of competition.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 56.4%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.29; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.