Shy-Anne Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260068889
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Bryan, TX, USA
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $133,191
- Expenses
- $128,972
- Assets
- $107,954
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lori Mervish (President)
People named in this filing
- Alice Martin (VP-Finance)
- Samantha Shields (VP-Communicatn)
- Denise Spears (VP-Fundraising)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of this organization is to promote the varsity athletic Dance and Drill Team activities at Bryan High School by supporting the directors and school officials in the following ways:-Facilitate communication between parents, directors and BHS administrators-Create an environment that encourages student and parent participation-Provide supervised social activities-Support participation in dance and drill team programs within the school and community-Organize and coordinate fundraising to assist in off-setting expenses of the Shy-Anne Dance and Drill Team activities.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization achieved the promotion of the varsity athletic Dance and Drill Team activities at Bryan High School by supporting the directors and school officials. The organization facilitated communication, created an encouraging environment, supervised activities, supported participation in events, promoted the programs to the community and organized fundraisers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $123K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.