Shrm - Morris County Chapter Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 522371581
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Kinnelon, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 2016374347
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,473
- Expenses
- $41,923
- Assets
- $72,166
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHELLY KOONCE SPHRSHRM-SCP (VICE PRESIDENT - STAFFING & MGMT)
- DAVID LICHTENBERG ESQ (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- LINDSAY HUMPHREYS (VICE PRESIDENT - MEMBERSHIP)
- KERRIE OBERMEYER (VICE PRESIDENT - FINANCE)
- TRICIA SHEA (PRESIDENT)
- DAN BENDUCCI (VICE PRESIDENT - CERTIFICATION)
People named in this filing
- CONNIE WARD (CHAPTER ADVISOR)
- CHRISTINE SCOTT PHRSHRM-CP (CHAPTER SECRETARY)
- SHELLY KOONCE SPHRSHRM-SCP (VICE PRESIDENT - STAFFING & MGMT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Shrm - morris county chapter, inc. (morris county shrm), an "affiliate" of the national society for human resource management, is a community of hr professionals offering monthly educational and networking opportunities for our members and the business community. We also provide support to community organizations seeking our expertise.
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide educational and networking meetings for human resource professionals who work and/or live in morris county, nj.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.1%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 72.1%; rating input score 72
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 38.8%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.72; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.1% of revenue deployed · 72.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $30K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.