Shriners International - Oleika Shriners Group Return
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237425093
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Lexington, KY, USA
- Phone
- 8592776869
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fraternal Societies
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $278,825
- Expenses
- $290,092
- Assets
- $415,306
- Liabilities
- $87,936
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
74 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GARY BLANKENSHIP (39 CLUB VICE PRESIDENT)
- BILLY HOWARD (BARBOURSVILLE PRESIDENT)
- SHAWN SMITH (BARBOURSVILLE VICE PRESIDENT)
- PHILIP BALL (BELL COUNTY VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAVID THORNTON (CAPITOL CITY PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL BARNES (CAPITOL CITY VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RANDY STURGILL (MOUNTAIN SHRINE 2ND VP)
- JAMES GROSS (LAUREL COUNTY CHAPLAIN)
- JARED HALEY (MOUNTAIN SHRINE PRES)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fraternal organization wtih a philanthropic mission
What it reported doing in 2022
Philanthropic fraternal organization
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, 35% for grants, and 0% for affiliated organizations.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 66.5%; rating input score 66; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.43; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 32.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 74 of 74 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $290K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 74 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.