Shree Jalaram Mandir

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611516244
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Hoffman Estates, IL, USA
Phone
2248053726
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hinduism
Affiliation
Hinduism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$915,491
Expenses
$496,181
Assets
$4,622,609
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Bhavna Thakkar (President)
  • Harivadan Thakkar (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Rajendra Thakkar (Chairman)
  • Ashish Thakkar (Vice-Chairman)
  • Yogesh Thakkar (General Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mandir provides common platform for all religious and social programs keeping in view the youths. It celebrates social, and religious programs and health programs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Jalaram mandir performs Mangla Arti, Sanghar Arti, Rajbhog Arti, and Sndhya Arti,, It celebrates religious and social programs - Ganesh mahotsav, Satyanarayan katha, Gokulasthmi, Tulsi Vivah, Navaratri 9 days garba, Patotsav, Holi, Dhuleti, Rath Yatra, Vat Savitri, Diwali celebration, Raksha Bandhan, Bhajans on every Thrusday, Sundar-Kanda path on every saturday, Shiv Puran Katha for 9 days by a saint from London. We celebrates 4h July and have a Foat in Chicago with about 30 boyas and girls. Monthly Health clinic, Two Blood donation programs. Ayurved Health clinnic. Also social prorams for youth and children.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 90
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.3%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.8%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.32; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $496K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.