Shree Hari Dham Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813617141
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Norwood, MA, USA
Phone
7812040359
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hinduism
Affiliation
Hinduism

Reported finances

Revenue
$69,040
Expenses
$73,127
Assets
$111,487
Liabilities
$95,229

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANAND SHUKLA (President)

People named in this filing

  • ANAND SHUKLA (President)
  • BHAMIN CHHATRAPATI (Secretary)
  • SHITAL SHUKLA (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote vaishnavism teachings, understanding of hindu religion and practice of sanatan sharma, an ancient path of hindu religion that existed over 5000 years ago in dwaparyuga during the era of lord krishna.

What it reported doing in 2024

To promote vaishnavism teachings, understanding of hindu religion and practice of sanatan sharma, an ancient path of hindu religion that existed over 5000 years ago in dwaparyuga during the era of lord krishna. During the year there were 14 hindu religious festivals that were celebrated along with weekly tuesday, saturday and sunday programs, which included reciting and singing of devotional chanting and meditation. All programs included discourses on learning and teachings of the hindu religion scriptures such as vedas, bhagwat maha puran, and bhagavat geeta.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.9%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.52; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.85; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $72K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.