Show-Me Curriculum Administrators Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431819817
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2014, Form 990-T 2020
Location
Kansas City, MO, USA
Phone
(833) 935-5739
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Federated Giving Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$231,875
Expenses
$259,316
Assets
$120,342
Liabilities
$2,808

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR MOLLIE BOLTON (President)
  • BOBBI CLATWORTHY (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • DR MOLLIE BOLTON (President)
  • DR STACI JOHNSON (Director)
  • BRANDON WALLACE (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide support to member school districts for the development, implementation, and evaluation of local curriculum.

What it reported doing in 2024

In July 2024, SMCAA conducted Quality Curriculum Retreat in person. This event was attended by 13 participants. During this statewide event, we looked at how education today is different from past years. Focus topics included information on durable skills and market value assets, developing success ready curricula, and protocols for evaluating and aligning instructional activities. Updates were also provided related to SMCAAs Foundational Social Studies curriculum, legislation impacting districts, and Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) initiatives.We were able to host our Annual Fall Conference in October 2024. The theme for our conference was Supporting the Science of Reading Beyond the ELA Classroom. Our keynote speaker was Dr. Katie McKnight, a dedicated teacher and award-winning author with over 30 years of classroom experience. Our breakout sessions included topics ranging from The Power of Words: Vocabulary Development, Preparing Your Educators for Literacy at the College Level; and Supporting Literacy through AI and Beyond. Missouri Commissioner of Education, Dr. Karla Eslinger, provided a lunch keynote, and Susan German, DESE Coordinator of Curriculum provided timely and relevant updates as well. A total of 53 participants attended this event. Evaluations were good and we used recommendations for planning our 2025 Fall Conference. Our 2025 Winter Symposium theme was Bringing Our Curriculum to Life and was held in February 2025. It was not as well attended as in previous years due to conflicts with other state meetings and with having to reschedule due to inclement weather on the initial dates. We had a total of 32 attendees in person. This event included hosted presenters from DESE, focusing on Using Fine Arts to Bring Core Curriculum to Life, Updates on Resources Available to Bring Civics and Patriotism to Life, Shifting Classroom Practices that Lead to Mathematical Proficiency, Using Primary/First Hand Sources of Missourians to Bring ELA Non-Fiction to Life, and Addressing the Literacy Needs of Secondary Teachers and Students. Alex Demczak provided an engaging keynote on Bringing Leadership to Life. The Annual Curriculum Bootcamp in June 2024 was replaced with SMCAAs first Assessment Summit. The Summit focused on the six assessment tenets and how they could be utilized to create a truly guaranteed and viable written, taught, and assessed curriculum. A pre-Summit was held, giving attendees the opportunity to learn from assessment vendors that were approved by DESE as part of their literacy initiative. This event was planned by using direct feedback related to DESE initiatives and assessment. Thirty three individuals attended this new event. After the Summit the decision was made to move back to a curriculum focus for the 2025 June event. The 2024 Instructional Leadership training in June focused on Meeting the Needs of Our New and Non-Traditional Teachers. Participants were divided based on their role and training was provided for each group separately. This event had 32 participants attending the two-day event, with 13 attending the leadership strand and 19 participating in the teacher strand. Sessions in both strands were designed to help provide techniques and strategies to help new teachers be successful in their trade.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.5%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 80%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.8%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.46; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 89.5% of revenue deployed · 80% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 12 filed program accomplishments · $207K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.