Shoreline Vision Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261676444
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Muskegon, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2317399009
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Eye Diseases, Blindness and Vision Impairments
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,089
- Expenses
- $30,889
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Michelle Cassens (President)
People named in this filing
- Michelle Cassens (President)
- Nancy Ann Hornacek (Secretary)
- Richard Flickema (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide assistance with eye examinations, durable medical equipment and eye surgeries. The Foundation will spend approximately 100 of its time and resources on this activity. The Board of Directors will work with schools, social services and the community to determine those persons in need of visual assistance. Eye examinations and eye surgeries will be provided by a licensed eye care provider at the offices of Shoreline Ophthalmology, PC, 1266 East Sherman Blvd., Muskegon, Michigan 49444. The licensed eye care providers who examine those persons will be volunteers.
What it reported doing in 2018
Provide assistance with eye examinations, durable medical equipment and eye surgeries. The foundation will spend approximately 100 of its time and resources on this activity. The Board of Directors will work with schools, social services and the community to determine those persons in need of visual assistance. Eye examinations and ete surgeries will be provided by an licensed eye care provider at the offices of Shoreline Ophthalmology, PC, 1266 East Sherman Blvd.,, Muskegon, Michigan 49444. The licensed eye care provixders who examine those persons will be volunteers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -507%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.