Shootin for a Cure
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463222049
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Cresson, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8173132278
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $156,598
- Expenses
- $129,681
- Assets
- $122,971
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARCI GRAY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARCI GRAY (PRESIDENT)
- DEBBIE HICKS (VICE PRESIEN)
- KATRINA BRIGGS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote awareness and to aid in the process in finding a cure for cancer as well as assist local victims that cannot afford or lack the monies and other resources necessary for medical care.
What it reported doing in 2025
1a)organization currently hosts a fund raising event for the purpose of assisting individuals/local victims facing the incredibly devastating battle of cancer and are struggling with money for treatment and routine doctor visits. 1b)organization also currently hosts a fundraiser to help meet and/or exceed the goal of 2,300 per participating walker, to be a part of an incredible support event of the susan g komen 3 day 60 mile walk. Between individual benefit donations and susan g komen research and development we were able to donate 1,937.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 34.3%; rating input score 34
- Program expense ratio: 41.4%; rating input score 41
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.2%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 34.3% of revenue deployed · 41.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $54K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.