Shoot for Cooper Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463936741
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Reedsville, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9206827881
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,869
- Expenses
- $21,419
- Assets
- $23,541
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAN BEAUPRE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DAN BEAUPRE (PRESIDENT)
- GERALD FISCHER (VICE PRESIDE)
- CINDY BUBOLZ (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of shoot for cooper, inc., is to raise proceeds to assist families in financial distress who have encountered a situation whereby a child in their family is in need of medical or hospital care in the memory of cooper beaupre. Further, shoot for cooper, inc., shall raise proceeds in memory of cooper beaupre to support, foster and financially assist local students with the expenses and costs of daycare or high school education.
What it reported doing in 2020
Establishing events to provide entertainment to children and their families while in a hospital-setting at the children's hospital of Wisconsin milwaukee, as well as providing support to the annual family memorial program at children's hospital of Wisconsin in the fox valley which provides services for families who have experienced the death of a child. These programs have served over 1420 families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 68% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -54.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -51.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -50.4% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.