Shoes That Fit
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954425565
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Claremont, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9094820050
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,083,238
- Expenses
- $17,234,897
- Assets
- $5,285,390
- Liabilities
- $1,060,693
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMY FASS (CEO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- AMY FASS (CEO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $302,777 total reported compensation
- NEKEDA HALL (CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER): $169,942 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Shoes that fit tackles one of the most visible signs of poverty in america by giving children in need new athletic shoes to attend school with dignity and joy, prepared to learn, play and thrive.
What it reported doing in 2024
During the academic year 2024-2025, shoes that fit distributed 334,039 pairs of new athletic shoes and other necessities to 218,302 children in need at 2,135 schools and/or nonprofits in all 50 states and Washington d.c., allowing these children to attend schools with dignity and joy, prepared to learn, play and thrive. 94% of educators how responded to our survey reported improvement in the children's confidence, 92% in self-esteem, 85% in social interaction, and 74% in physical activity among the children who received the new shoes from shoes that fit. In addition, shoes that fit distributed 26,119 items to help the same number of individuals for emergency fire relief after the palisades and eaton canyon fires.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 88% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.3%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -31.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $303K · 19 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $115K reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.