Shift Nc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
561493369
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Durham, NC, USA
Phone
9192661220
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,799,867
Expenses
$2,852,867
Assets
$765,748
Liabilities
$1,235,788

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANA MANGUM (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • DANA MANGUM (CEO): $129,479 total reported compensation
  • SUBRAMANIAN SUBU CHITTUR SRINIVASAN (CFO UNTIL DECEMBER): $116,925 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sexual health matters. We work to empower north carolinians so that every adolescent grows up in a state that is equipped to support their sexual health. Investing in young people's sexual health benefits them, our state, and our communities now and in the future. We accomplish this through evidence-based programming, training, and statewide policy work.

What it reported doing in 2020

All together now (atn), is an initiative to provide training, technical assistance, and coaching to help publicly funded health centers in durham, nc adopt best practices in teen healthcare and improve accessibility, quality, and youth-centered sexual and reproductive healthcare services. As a result, atn developed a coordinated network of healthcare centers and yso partners in durham county that resulted in teens receiving services at partner clinics, a 19% increase in contraceptive coverage, and a 31% increase in sti testing, counseling, or treatment for youth ages 15-19 in durham, nc. The atn project ended and was closed out on december 29, 2020.every teen counts (etc) is an initiative to build organizational and programmatic capacities of the nc foster care and juvenile justice systems to implement evidence based programs (ebp) with youth. Over the course of a year, etc strengthened the capacity of 7 local departments of social service agencies and juvenile justice partners resulting in staff providing over 75 hours of virtual training and technical assistance to 33 system professionals implementing an ebp virtually and in-person with approximately 79 foster care youth throughout the northeastern, eastern and central regions of the state. Healthy tomorrow alliance (hta) is a collaborative of health care providers, youth-serving organizations, and the cone health foundation to connect young people and their families to high-quality, teen-friendly health care services in greensboro. Hta served seven health care partners and continued to work with two youth-serving organization partners. Teen pregnancy rates continue to decline throughout the duration of this project, from 26.3% in 2016 to 20.5% in 2019, and 17.6% in 2021. All clinic partners implemented at least 21 of the 29 recommended teen friendly clinic best practices. Nc a&t peer educators hosted campus sti testing days to educate peers on contraceptive methods and clinic partners. A new e-learning platform was launched to meet the remote learning needs of our clinic partners. 64 participants completed at least 1 training course using this e-learning platform. In addition to the prerecorded webinars the following trainings were made available to them via the e-learning platform: adolescent development, minors' rights, and connecting teens to care. Digital advertising campaigns focused on promoting telehealth and keeping youth connected to healthcare in response to the covid-19 pandemic. Instagram and snapchat ads produced 1,392 views to the greensboro landing page on the playbook website.laughing gull foundation: shift nc collaborated with community organizations to implement three virtual focus groups (fgs) with racially and gender diverse lgbtq+ students throughout nc. We analyzed data and summarized findings in white papers that report students' recommendations for sex ed, school policies, educator resources, and responding to anti-lgbtqia language in the classroom. We began to disseminate findings. We updated a resource list for local lgbtq+ young people and provided resource referrals/recommendations for shift nc project partners and other community members statewide who inquired about topics such as finding a lgbtqia-competent therapist for children or emergency housing for trans youth. We updated materials in a lgbtq+ terminology learning activity that is utilized in our trainings; and facilitated an internal terminology learning session with staff. We developed/reviewed lgbtqia content for virtual trainings with health care providers, youth educators, and child custody systems.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 88% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.3%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 68%; rating input score 68
  • Fundraising efficiency: $108.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97.3%; rating input score 97; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.9%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.61; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69.3% of revenue deployed · 68% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $129K · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2016 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.