Sheriff Deputy Sergeant Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943327994
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
French Camp, CA, USA
Phone
2097126563
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Labor Unions

Reported finances

Revenue
$21,048
Expenses
$12,695
Assets
$39,059
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICHARD ESTER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID LECOMPTE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RICHARD ESTER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANDY LANE (SECRETARY)
  • JUSTIN MILLMORE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The sheriff deputy sergeant association is the collective bargaining unit for san joaquin county deputy sergeants. The association negotiates the memorandum of understanding with the san joaquin county labor division and works to secure better working conditions, wages, and similar benefits for its members. In addition, the association represents members with employment and working condition grievances before the san joaquin county labor relations division. The association also provides support to various exempt orhganizations and actively supports the san joauqin county s.t.a.r.s (sheriff's team of active retired seniors). A voluntary organization of concerned citizens who assist aith community outreach and issues.

What it reported doing in 2024

Porac - the association and members are part of peace officers research association of California (porac). Porac represemt California peace officers statewide. Porac identifies safety needs to its members along with providing other benefits such as insurance and retiree medical benefits. The porac legal defense fund protects the legal rights of its members. In addition, the association and porac are advocates for legislation that keeps officers and their families safe.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54.2%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.7%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.08; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 29.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.2% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.