Shenandoah Community Health Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300300989
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Martinsburg, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3042634999
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $111,612
- Expenses
- $108,503
- Assets
- $222,218
- Liabilities
- $141,241
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL HASSING (CEO)
- CHARLES PRINTZ JR (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL HASSING (CEO)
- TODD LOCKCUFF (CFO)
- CHARLES PRINTZ JR (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's primary purpose is to support shenandoah valley medical system, inc., which is an organization devoted to improving the health of the residents of morgan, berkeley, and jefferson counties, West Virginia, and adjacent areas by: (1) increasing accessibility, continuity, and quality of the health services provided; (2) restraining increases in costs and preventing unnecessary duplication of health resources; and (3) encouraging and supporting integrated health care delivery systems.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization provides financial support for programs providing primary medical care, ob/gyn, behavioral health and oral health services for the uninsured and the underinsured.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 96% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 74.8%; rating input score 75
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.05; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 352.5%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75% of revenue deployed · 74.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $81K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.